In Vitro Antibacterial Activity and Phytochemical Screening of Garcinia kola Extracts against Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)
Abubakar U. Zage, Isma’il Ahmed, Lawan D. Fagwalawa
Affiliation
1Microbiology Department, Kano University of Science and Technology Wudil Kano
2Biological Science Department, Kano University of Science and Technology Wudil Kano
Corresponding Author
Muhammad Ali, Biological Science Department, Kano University of Science and Technology, Wudil Kano, E-mail: alimuhd4real@gmail.com
Citation
Muhammad, A. et al. In Vitro Antibacterial Activity and Phytochemical Screening of Garcinia Kola Extracts against Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA). (2018) J Pharm Pharmaceutics 5(1): 13- 18.
Copy rights
© 2018 Muhammad, A. This is an Open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Keywords
Antibacterial activity; Garcinia kola; Methicillin Resistant; Staphylococcus aureus; phytochemical
Abstract
Modern medicines have always depended on herbal extracts from plants as fundamental source of therapeutic ingredients. The aim of the study was to determine the phytochemical constituents and antibacterial activity of Garcinia kola seed extracts against clinical isolates of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA). Total of 107 Staphylococcus isolates from infected wound and urine and were collected from Abubakar Imam Urology Center in Kano State, Nigeria over a period of eight months (October 2015 to May 2016). A disc diffusion method was used for characterization of MRSA. The phytochemical screening of the plant materials was done using conventional laboratory method while the antibacterial activity of the plant extracts was determined using agar well diffusion method. The result of bacterial characterization showed that eight isolates found were to be Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Phytochemical screening of the seeds, leaves and stem bark extracts indicated the presence of Alkaloid, Tannin, Saponin, and Cardiac glycoside, Flavonoid, Terpenoid, Phenols Anthraquinone and Steroid. However, reducing sugar is absent. The antibacterial activity of the plant showed that the plant part extracts demonstrated antimicrobial effect against the test isolates with higher activity in seeds compared to leaves and stem. Statistical analysis of the result revealed that the overall average zone of inhibition shown by the extracts is 11.68 mm with methanolic seeds extract exerting the highest antibacterial effects on the test isolates with average zone of inhibition of 12.78 mm, followed by methanolic leaf extract 12.37 mm then aqueous seed extract with zone of inhibition of 11.87 mm. Least zones of inhibition were recorded in aqueous leaf extract and methanolic stem back extract with zones of inhibition of 11.28 and 10.43 mm respectively. The Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) and Minimum Bactericidal Concentration (MBC) of the extracts range from 12.5 – 100 mg/ml of the extracts. Findings from this work support the use of seed extracts from G. kola as medicinal plant.
Introduction
Plants are generally known to produce certain bioactive compounds used to protect them from microbial invasion. However, several researches conducted on such plants demonstrated that the bioactive components of the plants can also play an important role in protecting human diseases. The plants based compounds can be derived from leaves, stem bark, roots, fruits, seeds and flowers. As result of their versatile application, medicinal plants have become the richest source of drugs in traditional and modern medicine[1]. Several leaves and leaves extracts have been found to have antimicrobial activity against microorganisms. Several hundred genera of plants were utilized traditionally for medicinal purposes[2]. The antibacterial activity of plant is due to present of phytochemical constituents in them. Phytochemicals are secondary metabolites present in medicinal plants which include terpenoid, flavonoids, steroid, Alkaloids and phenolic compounds. The phytochemicals have impressive pharmaceutical properties such as analgesics, aesthetic, antibiotics, antiparasitic, anti-inflammatory, oral contraceptive, hormones and ulcer therapeutic laxative.
Garcinia kola is forest tree indigenous to sub-Saharan Africa and has been referred to as a ‘wonder plant’ because almost every part of it has been found to be of medicinal importance[3]. It occurs naturally from Sierra Lone to Southern Nigeria and on into Zaire and Angola, but is further distributed by man and is often found cultivated around villages. Garcinia kola belongs to a family of tropical plants known as Guttifera. It is an evergreen tree grown in the tropical rainforest of West Africa[4].
The parts used in this plant are the stem bark, seeds and root. The active ingredients are flavonoids, apigenin, kolaviron, biflavonoid - ametoflavone, saponins, tannins, resin[5]. Medicinally, the stem bark and seeds are used for acute fever, cough, and liver disorders and as an anti-vomiting agent[6]. It is also used as a remedy for inflammations of respiratory tract, bronchitis, throat troubles, stomach ache and gastritis[7]. The seed extract is very efficacious for hepatitis, antiseptic and is active against Gram-positive and negative bacteria[8]. The decoction of the root is used as aphrodisiac, evacuant, anticancer and is also recommended for dysentery, headache, malignant tumours and respiratory ailments[6]. The root is chewed for cleaning teeth and toothache. The phytochemical compounds isolated from G. kola include oleoresin, tannins, saponins, alkaloids, cardiac glycosides[9].
Staphylococcus aureus is a bacterium of significant importance because of its ability to cause a wide range of diseases and capacity to adapt to diverse environmental forms. The organism colonizes skin, skin glands and mucous membrane, causing infections both in human and animals such as rashes, inflammations of bones and the meninges as well as septicaemia[10]. In addition, S. aureus causes inflammation of the mammary gland in bovine and the lower part of the foot in poultry[11]. Penicillin and its derivatives, including methicillin have been used for the treatments of infections caused by S. aureus[12]. However, certain strains of S. aureus developed resistance known as methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). At present, less than 90% of S. aureus strains are resistant to most penicillin derivatives[13] and ordinary antimicrobial agents like drugs from the family of amino glycosides, macrolides, chloramphenicols, tetracycline’s and fluoroquinolones[14].
Materials and Methods
Ethical approval
Ethical approval for this research was obtained from the Hospital Service Management Board (HSMB), Kano based on the consent of Murtala Muhammad Specialist Hospital, Sir Muhammad Sunusi Specialist Hospital and Abubakar Imam Urology Centre Ethical Committees
Study area
Clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus were obtained from three hospitals within Kano metropolis which include Murtala Mohammed Specialists’ Hospital, Sir Muhammad Sunusi Specialists’ Hospital and Abubakar Imam Urology centre (MMSH, MSSH and AIUC). Characterization and identification of Staphylococcus aureus and Methicillin Resistance Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) was conducted in the Departments of Biological sciences and Microbiology of Kano University of Science and Technology Wudil. Determination of antimicrobial activity of the extracts against MRSA was done at Microbiology laboratory of Kano University of Science and Technology Wudil. Phytochemical screening of the extract was done at Biochemistry laboratory of Bayero University, Kano.
Sample collection
One hundred and seven (107) suspected Staphylococcus isolates were collected from three different hospitals within Kano State metropolis over a period of eight months (October, 2015 to May, 2016). The isolation of Staphylococcal isolates was done by culturing various clinical samples of wounds and pus (n = 37), High vaginal swab (HVS) (n = 29) and urine (n = 41) on a surface of Nutrient agar (Lifesave Biotech, USA). The plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 h for colony formation. Each colony was isolated in a pure form by sub culturing for further studies and identification. Discrete colonies of each isolate were kept in peptone water. The bacterial strains were then stored at 4oC for further experiments.
Identification of staphylococcus aureus
The isolates were confirmed as Staphylococcus aureus by conventional microbiological methods: Gram staining, Biochemical test (Coagulase test and Catalase test) and Mannitol fermentation test. Gram staining was done according to the methods described by Chessbrough[15]. Coagulase and Catalase tests were done according to the method described by Holt et al[16]. Mannitol fermentation test was done by inoculating the isolates onto the surface of Mannitol Salt agar and incubated at 37 for 24 hours[16].
Identification of methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)
Eighty three (83); isolates confirmed as Staphylococcus aureus were later subjected to antimicrobial sensitivity testing for methicillin resistant using modified Kirby Bauer diffusion method on Muller Hinton agar and incubated for 24 hours at 37 . The methicillin resistant were tested using commercially prepared antibiotics discs containing Oxacillin (1 μg), Ampicillin (10 μg), Doxycycline (10 μg), Ciprofloxacin (30 μg), Cefoxitin (10 μg), and Ceftriaxone (30 μg) discs. The inoculums suspension was adjusted to match 0.5 McFarland turbidity standards. A sterile cotton swab was dipped into the adjusted suspension and excess inoculums was removed by pressing the swab firmly on the inside wall of the tube. The solidified surface of Mueller Hinton agar plate was inoculated by streaking the swab over the entire surface. The antimicrobial discs were placed firmly on the surface of the inoculated agar plate using sterile forceps. The plates were incubated at 37 for 24 hours. The plates were examined and the diameters of the zones of inhibition were measured. Results were classified as susceptible, intermediate, or resistant, according to the approved guidelines of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute[17].
Plant Material
Collection, identification and processing
The plant materials used in the research work including seeds stem bark, and leaves of Garcinia kola were obtained from Kofar Mazugal kolanuts market in Kano municipal Local Government Area, Kano. Identification and authentication of the plant materials were done at Herbarium unit in the Department of Plant Science, Bayero University Kano with the following Herbarium accession number DPB/BUK/HIF/0667 and voucher specimens were deposited there for future references. The seeds of Garcinia kola were removed from the seed coat washed and air dried for two weeks. The leaves and stem were also cut into bits for fast drying. They were air dried for two weeks and crushed to fine powder using a sterile mortar and pestle. The powdered form of the seed, stem bark and leaves of Garcinia kola were placed in different air tight containers, properly labeled and stored for further use.
Preparation of extracts
Aqueous and ethanol extracts of Garcinia kola leaves were prepared separately. Fifty grams (50 g) powder of the plant material was mixed with 500 ml each of distilled water and methanol respectively. The flasks were kept for 72 hours with intermittent shaking. Thereafter, filtration was done using Whatman filter paper. The methanol extracts was evaporated at 50°C using rotary evaporator while the aqueous extract was evaporated at 40°C in water bath until dried extract samples were obtained. The dried filtrates were reconstituted in 10 % DMSO thereby making a final concentration of 200 mg/ml as a stock concentration. The extract solutions were kept at 4°C before use[18].
Qualitative phytochemical screening
The screening of the phytochemical constituents of the plant materials for various phytochemical constituents such as terpenoids, flavonoids, alkaloids, reducing sugars, steroid, glycoside, phenol, Anthraquinones, saponin and tannin was conducted using standard methods as described by Sofowora[19] and Trease and Evans[20].
Antibacterial activity of the extracts
The sensitivity of each extracts was determined using the agar well diffusion[21]. The prepared bacterial suspension equivalent to 0.5 McFarland Standard (1.5 x 106 CFU) was inoculated onto sterile surface of Mueller - Hinton agar medium (MHA) in a 13mm Petri - dish. A cork borer of 6 mm diameter size was utilized to produce 5 holes at equidistance on the medium. The holes were supplied with approximately 0.1 ml of the prepared extracts at a various concentration of 25, 50, 75 and 100 mg / ml. The plates were allowed to diffuse on the laboratory bench for 1 hour. The inoculated plates were incubated at 37°lC for 24 hours. Zones of inhibition produced by the extracts against the test isolates were observed and measured. The experiment was conducted in triplicate and the average values were recorded. Clindamycin 125 mg / ml (Micro Lab limited) was served as a control (positive) for the experiment.
Determination of mic of the extracts
Broth dilution technique was employed to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration MIC of the extracts. Double fold dilutions were prepared by adding 2 ml of 100 mg / ml of the extract into a test tube containing 2 ml of Nutrient broth, thus producing solution containing 50 mg / ml of the extract. The process continue serially up to test tube No. 5, hence producing the following concentrations; 50, 25, 12.5, 6.25 3.125 mg/ml. Test tube No. 6 do not contain extracts and serve as negative control. Exactly 0.5 ml of 0.5 McFarland equivalent standards of test organisms were introduced into the test tubes and incubated at 37°C for 24 hours. After incubation the test tubes were observed for growth by checking for turbidity[21].
Determination of mic of the extracts
From each tube that did not show visible growth in the MIC, Briefly, 0.1 ml bacterial culture was pipetted from MIC tubes which did not show any growth and sub cultured onto the surface of Mueller Hilton agar plates. The inoculated plates were incubated at 37°C for the period of 24 hours. The MBC was recorded as the lowest concentration of extract without single colony of bacteria on Mueller Hilton agar plates[21].
Statistical analysis
The data obtained on antibacterial activity of the extracts against the test isolates was analyzed using One - way analysis of variance (ANOVA). All the data were computed as means ± standard deviation using statistical program SPSS 21.0 (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences). Probability value of 0.05 was set to determine significant differences level on the activity of the extracts against the tested isolates.
Results
Identification of methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)
Antibiotic susceptibility test was carried out for 83 S. aureus isolates, and the zones of inhibition obtained were classified based on Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute in Tables 1 below. The antibiotic susceptibility test of the S. aureus isolates from wounds, HVS and urine showed that 8(15%) isolates were resistant to the beta – lactam antibiotics used with equal resistance to Oxacillin, Ampicillin and Cefoxitin. Comparing the three isolates from the sample sites (wounds, HVS and urine): the sensitivity test of the S. aureus isolates showed that wounds isolates have the highest resistance to the antibiotics used 5(13.5%), followed by urine isolates 2(9.61%) and the least is HVS 1(5.76%).
Table 1: Zone of inhibition of recovered MRSA strains against selected antibiotics.
Antibiotics / zones of inhibition (mm) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Isolate code | Oxa (1 μg) | Cef (30 μg) | Amp (10 μg) | Cip (30 μg) | Cex (10 μg) | Dox (10 μg) | Status |
W4 | 09 | 06 | 09 | 10 | 09 | 17 | MRSA |
W11 | 08 | 10 | 06 | 17 | 06 | 19 | MRSA |
W17 | 06 | 06 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 21 | MRSA |
W18 | 06 | 10 | 06 | 18 | 06 | 18 | MRSA |
W23 | 09 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 20 | MRSA |
H9 | 10 | 11 | 09 | 10 | 06 | 19 | MRSA |
U5 | 06 | 06 | 06 | 15 | 08 | 19 | MRSA |
U19 | 06 | 06 | 06 | 08 | 06 | 21 | MRSA |
Key W = Wounds isolates, H = HVS isolates, U = Urine isolates, Oxa = Oxacillin, Cef = Ceftriaxone, Amp = Ampicillin, Cex = Cefoxitin, Cip = Ciprofloxacin, Dox = Doxycycline
Phytochemical Screening
Phytochemical screening of leaves, seeds and stem back extracts in Table 2 indicates the presence of alkaloid, tannin, saponin, and cardiac glycoside, flavonoid, terpenoid, phenols anthraquinone and steroid. However, reducing sugar, flavonoid and steroid were absent in the leaves while reducing sugar, anthraquinone and saponin were absent in the stem back extract.
Table 2: Phytochemical screening of aqueous leaves, seeds and stem bark extracts of G. kola.
Phytochemical | Seeds extract | Leaves extract | Stem bark extract |
---|---|---|---|
Alkaloids | + | + | + |
Anthraquinone | + | + | +- |
Phenols | + | + | + |
Cardiac Glycosides | + | + | + |
Flavonoid | + | - | + |
Terpenoid | + | + | + |
Saponin | + | + | - |
Steroids | + | - | + |
Tannins | + | + | + |
Reducing sugar | - | - | - |
Key + = Presence of Phytochemical, - = Absent of Phytochemical
Antibacterial activity of the extracts
The antibacterial activity of the plant methanol seed extract against test isolates is presented in Table 3. The result shows that average zone of inhibition shown by the extracts is 11.68 mm with methanolic seeds extract exerting the highest antibacterial effects on the test isolates with average zone of inhibition of 12.78 mm, followed by methanolic leaf extract 12.37 mm then aqueous seed extract with zone of inhibition of 11.87 mm. Least zones of inhibition were recorded in aqueous leaf extract and methanolic stem back extract with zones of inhibition of 11.28 and 10.43 mm respectively. Zone of inhibition shown by control (125 mg/ml Clindamycin), ranges from 17.00 – 22.00 mm.
Table 3: Zone of inhibition of different concentration of the Garcinia kola extracts against MRSA.
Extracts | Conc. (mg / ml) | Isolates / zones of inhibition (mm) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Is1 | Is2 | Is3 | Is4 | Is5 | Is6 | Is7 | Is8 | ||
SME | 50 | 12 | 10 | 06 | 06 | 11 | 13 | 09 | 11 |
100 | 15 | 11 | 10 | 06 | 12 | 15 | 11 | 14 | |
150 | 14 | 15 | 11 | 09 | 15 | 15 | 12 | 13 | |
200 | 18 | 15 | 19 | 10 | 19 | 20 | 15 | 17 | |
SAE | 50 | 10 | 06 | 10 | 06 | 12 | 10 | 11 | 10 |
100 | 13 | 11 | 10 | 06 | 15 | 12 | 13 | 12 | |
150 | 14 | 11 | 12 | 06 | 16 | 13 | 14 | 13 | |
200 | 15 | 13 | 16 | 10 | 18 | 17 | 16 | 10 | |
LME | 50 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 06 | 10 | 12 | 06 | 12 |
100 | 09 | 11 | 13 | 10 | 12 | 15 | 10 | 14 | |
150 | 12 | 13 | 15 | 09 | 16 | 14 | 12 | 14 | |
200 | 17 | 12 | 15 | 11 | 17 | 18 | 16 | 17 | |
LAE | 50 | 10 | 06 | 10 | 06 | 11 | 13 | 06 | 11 |
100 | 11 | 06 | 12 | 06 | 12 | 15 | 09 | 15 | |
150 | 10 | 09 | 14 | 06 | 14 | 14 | 12 | 17 | |
200 | 12 | 09 | 14 | 06 | 17 | 16 | 14 | 18 | |
SBME | 50 | 06 | 06 | 06 | 06 | 10 | 11 | 09 | 10 |
100 | 10 | 09 | 10 | 06 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 12 | |
150 | 10 | 10 | 11 | 06 | 12 | 15 | 10 | 11 | |
200 | 10 | 12 | 15 | 06 | 15 | 16 | 14 | 15 | |
SBAE | 50 | 06 | 10 | 06 | 06 | 10 | 12 | 10 | 11 |
100 | 11 | 11 | 09 | 06 | 12 | 14 | 11 | 14 | |
150 | 12 | 10 | 11 | 06 | 13 | 16 | 12 | 15 | |
200 | 11 | 13 | 1 | 06 | 15 | 18 | 14 | 16 | |
Contrl | 125 | 21 | 19 | 19 | 17 | 22 | 21 | 19 | 20 |
Key: SME= Seed Methanol Extract, SAE= Seed Aqueous Extract, LME= Leaves Methanol Extract, LAE= Leaves Aqueous Extract, SBME= Stem Bark Methanol Extract, SBAE= Stem Bark Aqueous Extract, Is = Isolates, Control = Clindamycin = 125 mg / ml
Minimum inhibitory concentration (mic) and mbc of the extracts
The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of the extracts is represented in table 4 and 5. The result showed that the MIC and MBC of the extracts range from 12.5 – 100 mg/ml of the extracts.
Table 4: Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of Garcinia kola extracts against MRSA.
Isolates/ MIC (mg/ml) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Extracts | Is1 | Is2 | Is3 | Is4 | Is5 | Is6 | Is7 | Is8 |
SME | 12.5 | 25.0 | 100 | 100 | 25 | 25 | 50 | 50 |
SAE | 25 | 100 | 25 | 100 | 12.5 | 25 | 25 | 25 |
LME | 25 | 25 | 25 | 100 | 50 | 12.5 | 100 | 12.5 |
LAE | 50 | NF | 25 | NF | 12.5 | 12.5 | 100 | 12.5 |
SBME | 100 | 100 | 100 | NF | 25 | 25 | 50 | 25 |
SBAE | 100 | 25 | 100 | NF | 12.5 | 12.5 | 25 | 12.5 |
Table 5: Minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of Garcinia kola extracts against MRSA.
Isolates / MIC (mg / ml) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Extracts | Is1 | Is2 | Is3 | Is4 | Is5 | Is6 | Is7 | Is8 |
SME | 25 | 25 | 100 | NF | 50 | 50 | 100 | 50 |
SAE | 25 | NF | 50 | NF | 25 | 50 | 50 | 100 |
LME | 50 | 100 | 50 | NF | 100 | 50 | NF | 100 |
LAE | 100 | NF | 50 | NF | 50 | 50 | NF | 100 |
SBME | NF | NF | NF | NF | 50 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
SBAE | NF | 100 | 100 | NF | 50 | 50 | 100 | 50 |
Key: SME= Seed Methanol Extract, SAE= Seed Aqueous Extract, LME= Leaves Methanol Extract, LAE= Leaves Aqueous Extract, SBME= Stem Bark Methanol Extract, SBAE= Stem Bark Aqueous Extract, Is = Isolates, NF = Not found
Discussion
The findings of this study demonstrated that MRSA isolates are resistant to beta lactam drugs such as oxacillin, ampicillin, ceftriaxone and cefoxitin (Table 1). The wide spread use of antibiotic resulted in the development of resistance to antibiotics through acquisition of the mobile cassette chromosome carrying the methicillin - resistant gene mecA[22] and mecC[23]. The resistance to methicillin was due to a penicillin-binding protein coded for by a mobile genetic element termed the methicillin - resistance gene –mecA[24]. In recent years, the gene has continued to evolve so that many MRSA strains are currently resistant to several different antibiotics such as penicillin, oxacillin and amoxicillin[25].
The Phytochemical screening of the plant parts revealed the present of Alkaloid, Tannin, Saponin, and Cardiac glycoside, Flavonoid, Terpenoid, Phenols Anthraquinone and Steroid. However, Reducing sugar, Flavonoid and steroid were absent in the leaves while Reducing sugar, Anthraquinone and Saponin were absent in the stem back extract (Table 2). The finding of this study was inconformity with that of Adegboye et al.[26] on Phytochemical screening of Garcinia kola, in which the results shows that Garcinia kola seeds contain steroids, cardiac glycosides, flavonoids, tannins, saponins and reducing sugars. The presence of the above phytochemicals in the plant parts was responsible for its antibacterial activity. Garcinia kola seeds flavonoids have been shown to possess anti-inflammatory, anti - hepatotoxic and antimicrobial activities[27]. Saponins are known to possess antibacterial activities[28,29] whilst tannins play an important role in wound healing and also possess some antimicrobial activities. Complex mixtures of steroid compounds from plants are known to exhibit some bioactivity[30]. Phytochemical and biochemical studies of Garcinia kola showed the presence of sterols, terpenoids, flavonoids, glycosides, pseudo-tannins, saponin, proteins and starch[31]. This result was also inconformity with the present study.
The present study showed that the leaves, seeds and stem back of G. kola possess antimicrobial potential against MRSA. In line with the present finding, several other studies have reported antimicrobial potentials. The plant is used for the treatment of liver disorders and has been shown to possess anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, antioxidant, antiviral, antidiabetic and anti-hepatotoxic activities[32]. The seeds are used in the treatment of bronchitis, throat infections, colics, headaches, chest colds, coughs, diarrhoea, hepatitis, asthma and dysmenorrheal/menstrual cramps[32]. The seed has also shown broad spectrum antibacterial activities[33]. The result of this finding was also in consistency with the result reported by Ogbulie et al.[34] on the antimicrobial efficacy of cold, hot water and ethanol extract of G. kola which revealed that cold and hot water extract of G. kola moderately inhibited the growth of Staphlococcus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes with zone of inhibition of between 9 - 15 mm. Also, found the cold and hot ethanol G. kola extracts profoundly inhibited the growth of S. aureus, S. pyogenes, E. coli and S. typhi to about 13 to 21 mm. The ethanol extracts of the G. kola, also profoundly inhibited the growth of S. aureus, S. pyogenes, E. coli and S. typhi with zones of inhibitions ranging from 13 - 22 mm.
Conclusion
The Phytochemical screening of the plant parts revealed the present of Alkaloid, Tannin, Saponin, and Cardiac glycoside, Flavonoid, Terpenoid, Phenols Anthraquinone and Steroid. The antibacterial activity of the Garcinia kola showed that the plant part extracts demonstrated antimicrobial effect against the test MRSA with higher activity in seeds compared to leaves and stem. Higher antibacterial activity was recorded in methanol extract when compared to aqueous extract. Findings from this work support the use of extracts from G. kola as medicinal plant.
References
- 1. Tiwari, P., Kumar, B., Kaur, M., et al. Phytochemical screening and Extraction. A Review. (2011) Internati Pharma Sci 1(1): 98-106.
Pubmed||Crossref||Others
- 2. Use of antibacterials outside human medicine and result and antibacterial resistance in humans. (2002) World Health Organization. Archieved from the Original on 13 May, 2004.
Pubmed||Crossref||Others
- 3. Dalziel, J.M. The Useful Plants of West Tropical Africa. (1937) Crown Agents for the Colonies 612.
Pubmed||Crossref||Others
- 4. Burkill, H.M. The Use ful Plants of Tropical Africa. (1937) Royal Botanical Garden Kew 6: 389.
Pubmed||Crossref||Others
- 5. Okunji, C.O., Ware, T.A., Hicks, R.P., et al. Capillary electrophoresis determination of biflavonones from Garcinia kola in three traditional African medicinal formulations. (2002) Planta Med 68(5): 440-444.
- 6. Odugbemi, T. Outlines and pictures of medicinal plants from Nigeria. (2006) University of Lagos Press 283.
Pubmed||Crossref||Others
- 7. Ajebesone, P.E., Aina, J.O. Potential African Substances for Hops in Tropical Beer Brewing. (2004) J. Food Technol. Afr 9(1): 13-16.
Pubmed||Crossref||Others
- 8. Gill, L. S. Ethno medicinal uses of plants in Nigeria. (1992) UNIBEN press 275.
Pubmed||Crossref||Others
- 9. Ebana, R.U., Madunagu, B.E., Ekpe, E.D., et al. Microbiological exploitation of cardiac glycosides and alkaloids from Garcinia kola, Borreria ocymoides, Kola nitida and Citrus aurantifolia. (1991) J Appl Bacteriol 71(5): 398-401.
- 10. Aklilu, E., Zunita, Z., Hassan, L., et al. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of methicillin - resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolated from dogs and cats at university veterinary hospital, Universiti Putra Malaysia. (2010) Trop Biomed 27(3): 483-492.
- 11. Quinn, P.J., Carter, M.E., Markey, B.K. et al. Staphylococcus species In: Clinical veterinary microbiology, Mosby, Edinburgh, 118-126. 2000
Pubmed||Crossref||Others
- 12. Rayner, C., Munckhof, W.J. Antibiotics currently used in the treatment of infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus. (2005) Intern Med J 35(2): 3-16.
- 13. Freeman-Cook, L., Freeman-Cook, K. Staphylococcus aureus infections. (2006) Chelsea house publishers, USA.
Pubmed||Crossref||Others
- 14. Lee, J.H. Methicillin (Oxacillin) - resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from major food animals and their potential transmission to humans. (2003) Appl Environ Microbiol 69(11): 6489–6494.
- 15. Chessbrough, M. District laboratory practice in tropical countries, second edition, part 2. (2006) Cambridge university press: 440.
Pubmed||Crossref||Others
- 16. Holt, J.G., Krieg, N.R., Sneath, P. A., et al. Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology. 9th edition. (1994) Williams Wilkins Co Baltimore, Maryland, 786.
Pubmed||Crossref||Others
- 17. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing.(2010) Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI).
Pubmed||Crossref||Others
- 18. Ali, M., Yahaya, A., Zage, A.U. et al. In-vitro Antibacterial Activity and Phytochemical Screening of Psidium guajava on Some Enteric Bacterial Isolates of Public Health Importance. (2017) J Advances in Med Pharmaceutical Sci 12(3): 1-7.
- 19. Sofowora, A.O. Medicinal plants and traditional medicine in Africa (1993). Uni of press 2nd Ed: 26-100.
Pubmed||Crossref||Others
- 20. Trease, G.E. Evans, W.C. A Textbook of Pharmacognosy 13th edition (1989). Bailliere Tinall Ltd, London.
Pubmed||Crossref||Others
- 21. Ahmed, I., Beg, A.Z. Antimicrobial and phytochemical studies on 45 Indian Medicinal plants against multi-drug resistance human pathogens. (2001) J Ethnopharmacol 74(2): 113-123.
- 22. Wielders, C.L.C., Fluit, A.C., Brisse, S., et al. MecA gene is widely disseminated in Staphylococcus aureus population. (2002). J. Clin Microbiol 40(11): 3970-3975.
Pubmed||Crossref||Others
- 23. Porrero, M.C., Harrison, E.M., Fernandez - Garayzabal, J.F., et al. Detection of mecC-MRSA isolates in river water: A potential role for water in the environmental dissemination. (2014) Environ Microbiol Rep 6(6):705-708.
Pubmed||Crossref||Others
- 24. Diekema, D.J., Pfaller, M.A., Schmitz, F.J., et al. Survey of infections due to Staphylococcus species: frequency of occurrence and antimicrobial susceptibility of isolates collected in the United States Canada, Latin America, Europe,and the Western Pacific region for the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program, 1997-1999. (2001) Clin Infect Dis 32(2): 114-132.
- 25. Muller, A.A., Mauny, F., Bertin, M., Relationship between spread of MRSA and antimicrobial use in a French university hospital. (2003) Clin Infect Dis 36(8): 971-978.
- 26. Adegboye, M.F., Akinpelu, D.A., Okoh, A.I. The bioactive and phytochemical properties of Garcinia kola (Heckel) seed extract on some pathogens. (2008) African J of Biotechnology 7(21): 3934-3938.
Pubmed||Crossref||Others
- 27. Madubunyi, I.I. Antimicrobial Activities of the Constituents of Garcinia kola seeds. (1995) Intern J Pharmacog 33(3): 232-237.
Pubmed||Crossref||Others
- 28. Gonzalez-Lamothe, R., Mitchell, G., Gattuso, M., et al. Plant antimicrobial agents and their effects on plant and human pathogens. (2009) Int J Mol Sci 10(8): 3400-3419.
- 29. Cowan, M. M. Plants Products as Antimicrobial Agents. (1999) American Society for Microbiology (ed.) Clinical Microbiology Reviews 12(4): 564-582.
Pubmed||Crossref||Others
- 30. Regasini, L.O., Vieira-junior, G.M., Fernandes, C.V., et al. Identification of triterpenes and sterols from Pterogyne nitens (Fabaceae-Caesalpinioideae) using high-resolution gas chromatography (2009) J Chil Chem Soc 54(3): 218-221.
- 31. Esimone, C. O., Nwafor, S. V., Okoli, C. O., et al. In Vivo Evaluation of Interaction Between Aqueous Seed Extract of Garcinia kola Heckel and Ciprofloxacin Hydrochloride. (2002) Am J Ther 9(4): 275-280.
Pubmed||Crossref||Others
- 32. Iwu, M. Okoli, C. O., Uzuegbu, D.B., et al. Handbook of African medicinal plants. (2002) CRC Press, Boca.
Pubmed||Crossref||Others
- 33. Ezeifeka, G.O., Orji, M.U., Mbata, T.I., et al. Antimicrobial activities of Cajanus cajan, Garcinia Kola and Xylopia aethiopica on pathogenic microorganisms. (2004) Biotechnol 3(1): 41-43.
- 34. Ogbulie, J. N., Ogueke, C. C., Nwanebu, F. C. Antibacterial Properties of Uvaria chaemae, Congronema latifolium, Garcinia kola, Vemonia amyggalia and Aframomium melegueta.(2007) Afr S Biotechnol 6(13): 1549-1553.
Pubmed||Crossref||Others